Customers, equal access to Internet
Customers should they pay more for their Internet access if they over-consumption of online video? Providers of Internet access they can slow the rate of subscriber connections that download on the Internet? No and no, slice the report of the mission on the neutrality of the Internet and networks, introduced Wednesday by deputies Laure La Raudière (UMP) and Corinne Erhel (CBC) Economic Affairs Committee of the National Assembly.
Anxious to "protect the Internet" in its current form, they detail the nine principles that should ensure an open Internet or "neutral" for Internet users. Proposals trenches that contrast with the approach of a "traffic control" as proposed by the Minister of the Digital Economy, Eric Besson.
The cornerstone of this report is the inclusion in the law, the principle of net neutrality.Its definition could be slipped in the Postal and Electronic Communications: "Capacity for Internet users to send and receive the content of their choice, or use the services to run applications of their choice, connecting the equipment of their choice (…) with a transparent quality of service, adequate and nondiscriminatory. "
The report also estimates that only obligations of a judicial or security must justify blocking access to the Internet. Therefore, access to file sharing sites should not be blocked upstream. "The network would not be neutral if the peer-to-peer was degraded," say the MPs, because peer-to-peer is used both to pirate music or movies that innovation as Internet telephony Skype.This does not apply the law to hackers.
Participate in financing
It does not include the principle of network neutrality into law, it is still necessary authority to enforce it. This authority could be the policeman telecom Arcep or judge. The authority will be particularly responsible for preventing telecom operators to restrict access to Internet content. The report wants to "reserve the term Internet access to only deals with the principle of neutrality."Thus, a mobile operator could no longer sell "unlimited Internet packages" when consumption is limited for example 500 megabytes per month or if it refuses to install applications like Skype Internet telephony.
If equal access to the Internet and is ringfenced from the Internet side, it remains to ensure services for publishers – video platforms, social networks, connected TV applications. For the service providers, the report proposes to "further reflection" on their participation in the financing of the Internet and network investment. He claims such a precise study of the costs of increased traffic on the Internet.Where appropriate, the report recommends that a mechanism by which sites get the traffic (such as YouTube, Google, Facebook, Skype …) are involved in financing networks by paying a kind of right of way. "It would stabilize the cost sharing of the network … and could encourage smaller players content," the report said. But it's a story at the European level.