Lower prices, or increase wages and create jobs, such were the promises made by professional restoration in exchange for declining to 5.5% VAT. In practice the government had forecast a drop in prices overall 3%. But the overall direction of Treasury at Bercy, the decrease was 2.5%, as it must take into account price increases (+ O, 1% a month) that would have been saved if there had been no reduction in VAT. According to Insee, the statistical institute, the decline recorded between July 2009 and end MayOnly a conservator two on average applied the lower price.
The shortfall of the state would it 2.35 billion euros a year on some 130 billion collected last year under the VAT.
Disagreement on Figures
As for salaries, increments and other benefits provided under the industrial agreement signed by the five trade unions and three of five business organizations in the sector would reach one billion euros accumulated since March 1, date of application the agreement saving account payday loan. Some 21,700 jobs have also been created, the government said. This figure is disputed by the union FO who believes him, he must subtract the 15,000 net new jobs recorded on average each year for ten years in this industry.
The measure would also have saved 25000 companies, nearly one third of the 80,000 restaurants in trouble before the reduction in VAT, as the specialist firm Gira Board.
Second lowest rate reduced
Twelve countries now have a reduced VAT on food in Europe. Since the authorization granted in 2009 by the European Commission. Only France and Belgium have taken the plunge. On 1 January 2010, Belgium has lowered its rate of 21-12% in food, drinks. Before the green light from Brussels, ten other member states had historically lower VAT in restaurants. With a rate of 5.5%, France has the second highest in the restoration reduces the lowest in Europe, just behind Luxembourg (3%).
The Regulatory Commission (CRE) had just agreed to the request of GDF Suez to raise gas prices as of July 1. They grow by 4.7%, bringing the increase to nearly 15% since the beginning of the year. Although this further increase was expected, the household energy bill begins to weigh.
However, Christine Lagarde, Minister of Economy, warned Friday that gas prices will not move until 1 January. Consumers will escape upwards so that additional sketched already by 1 October – the price revision is now making quarterly.
The "pause" as required by the Minister is made on behalf of a review of the formula currently allows GDF Suez to calculate its rates. In spring, the regulator had already begun an audit. It will therefore continue, before the drawing, probably new method of calculation.Knowing that GDF Suez is currently conducting a number of renegotiations with producer countries. "I hope that the CRE do an audit of this formula because I'm quite surprised at the speed of execution and I wish that as a result of this audit, we determine if the formula is good," said Christine Lagarde Friday on France Inter.
"The current tariff is not obsolete, but it can be optimized," says one expert dossier.In discussion, the long-term contracts underlying the supply of GDF Suez (with key suppliers such as Russia, Algeria and Norway), while the spot price of gas fall very weakly into account in calculating the formula.
The government takes the hand
"On a more general issue is whether to continue to index the price of oil on gas prices, even though overproduction of gas worldwide has resulted in a fall prices, "says one expert. However, increased consideration of market prices in the establishment of the formula may increase the volatility of rates. In all cases, the balance is difficult to find.
For the government, the record price of gas remains thorny.Early this year he thought he had found a solution by entrusting exclusively to the regulator, on the proposal of GDF SUEZ, the task of settling. But after two significant increases in quick succession, the government, well aware of the unpopular side of the increases among the public, are now forced to return to the game
In the Murdoch family, there is first a father, Rupert. The famous media magnate owns Newscorp, the Australian giant which owns among others the Fox television network, Twentieth Century Fox studios and newspapers The Wall Street Journal and The Sun.
Then there is the son, or more precisely the fourth son of Rupert James, now considered the likely successor to his father as head of News Corp.. Teenager James was known for his rebellious streak: bleached hair and piercing in the eyebrow, he distances himself from the family way, left Harvard in 1995 and created a hip hop label, Rawkus. After three years, the company, which generates an annual profit of 2.5 billion, was acquired by the company of Dad. James, suddenly sobered, is back in the family fold.
He became head of operations at News Corp. Internet without much success, then the satellite television network that makes Asian StarTV beneficiary. In 2003, his father appointed him director general of the British operator of satellite TV BSkyB.Quelques years later, he left his office to become chairman of BSkyB. James needed so as the most likely heir to his father. The two men are close, they called even daily according to the BBC. The Financial Times also reported an incident in April when James Murdoch, furious, entered the premises of The Independent in storming the cons of a newspaper stating: "Rupert Murdoch does not decide the outcome of the election – it is you who will.
Battle between BSkyB and News Corp: James is at odds
Today, James Murdoch is in a difficult position, combining the positions of chairman of BSkyB and Director of European and Asian operations of News Corp. payday loan. The group led by his father now wants to take full control of BSkyB which it already holds 39% shares. Last week, Newscorp has offered to buy the remaining shares at a price of 675 pence per share. It has raised its offer on Tuesday by offering 700 pence per share. The cost for Ruper Murdoch thus amounts to 7.8 billion pounds (about 9.4 billion euros), valuing the entire company at 12 billion pounds (14.5 billion euros) .
BSkyB has however rejected the offer, saying it significantly undervalues the company.In a statement, the British operator admits however that "an offer from News Corp. could serve the future interests of its shareholders" but said he would only accept a superior offer to 800 pence per share.
According to the Financial Times and the Daily Telegraph, James Murdoch would be steering clear of discussions of the board of BSkyB's offer of his father. The FT noted that "take full control of BSkyB would strengthen the business of James Murdoch is the corner of the empire his father knows best as a former CEO of satellite operator.
Following the announcement, as BSkyB jumped to the London Stock Exchange: just before 15h, action gained 19.40% to 717 pence. This surge up the operator above the purchase price offered by its parent.
The Paris Bourse is expected to continue its momentum from last week. Although nothing is played, far from it. But in recent days, the indices seem more determined to resume the upward path. Trading volumes – including the Paris Stock Exchange – have been more included. On Monday, futures are traded in Paris more than 1.10% at 3582 points. If the increase is confirmed, it would mark the fourth straight session of gains, that we have not seen for a long time.
On Friday, the CAC 40 gained just over 1% to just over 3555 points. On Wall Street, the Nasdaq has also allowed U.S. markets finished the week on a positive note.
After the month of May especially murderer for the whole compartment, investors believe that European markets are undervalued and therefore, that good things are done.
On the foreign exchange market, the strengthening of the euro was confirmed this morning – it is trading at 1.2183 dollars against 1.2077 on Friday. The euro is closer to $ 1.22 in the wake of the stock market, and good resolutions are shown in deficits on both sides of the Rhine, pending the meeting between Merkel and Sarkozy, this evening after the meeting you missed last Monday .
Values follow
Club Med
The group has announced the official name of the Chinese investor who took 7.1% stake in the leisure group, the group Fosum.
Societe Generale
The bank puts his hand on the CMS for a peuplus 870 million euros.An operation that was in the pipes for several weeks and was formalized this morning before the opening of the Parisian market.
Axa
The insurer has confirmed the sale of part of its life insurance business in the United Kingdom. The buyer, the group Resolution, is prepared to pay 3.3 billion euros to get their hands on this activity. Axa will keep activities damage, life insurance and individual savings.
Renault
The automaker is expected to benefit from information delivered over the weekend by its Russian partner Avtovaz plans to return to the green this year after heavy losses in 2009. The first constructor Russian head out of the water, enjoying the scrappage.
The U.S. investment bank is once again slammed. After being accused of fraud by the SEC, the policeman of the American Stock Exchange, Goldman Sachs is now summoned by an American committee. The Commission of Inquiry on the financial crisis (FCIC) which, by its investigations, seeks to identify the roots of the financial crisis, accuses Goldman Sachs of failing to comply in a timely manner to requests for disclosure and interviews.
The institution would, according to the FCIC, responded voluntarily incomplete and unsatisfactory to queries. Members of the Commission indicated that, after having asked some very specific, it had received investment banking unreasonable volume of documents, nearly 2.5 billion Web pages without an index, which does not meet questions."Our view is that they were very unhelpful, they do not provide us the documents we requested," said its chairman Phil Angelides.
The leaders of Goldman Sachs categorically deny these accusations. A spokesman for Goldman Sachs said the bank "continues to provide the information requested FCIC.
From our Washington correspondent
Goldman Sachs has managed to earn 3.7 billion dollars in betting, starting in 2007, the collapse of the mortgage-market. In doing so, the giant Wall Street acted against the interest of some of its customers, which it sold securities that he knew "toxic". This is the conclusion, after months of investigation, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the U.S. Senate.
Tuesday, during public hearings stretched on Capitol Hill, Lloyd Blankfein, the head of the giant Wall Street, has categorically denied these allegations."We do not speculate massively downward in the housing market and we certainly do not bet against our clients," he was forbidden under the spotlight, saying that even on the mortgage-market, Goldman Sachs has lost about $ 1.2 billion in 2007-2008.
"Nobody in the management of Goldman Sachs has never asked me to bet on a decline in the subprime market," added before skeptical senators, Joshua Birnbaum, the former head of structured products of the bank, also on the bench defendants.
Convinced otherwise, armed with emails and internal documents seized in the bank, the debonair Senator Carl Levin, glasses pavement at the end of his nose, led a determined assault Tuesday. But the chairman of the committee was confronted with a wall.He vainly tried to tell the past and present officials of Goldman Sachs called before him (including one French employee), how could they believe in the quality of debt issued by mortgage lenders whose reputation was terrible. Receivables classified as "business of shit" in an email exchange between two bank officials. "How many of these" affairs of shit "did you sell to your customers? asked, exasperated, Senator Levin. You've sold hundreds of millions. "
Bankers Daniel Sparks and Michael Swenson, impassive without being arrogant, but obviously confident of the merits of their point of view, seemed not to understand or what they asked or what they were charged.They also questioned the methods of calculating profits of Goldman Sachs selected by the committee.
Battle of Senate proceedings
According to Senator Levin, the investment bank has yet actually decided in late 2006 to a major cleanup of its accumulated risk on securities backed by the real estate markets whose collapse loomed. By discipline, to limit its risks and if possible in the hope of profiting from the trend, the bank had sold to investors and deliberately chosen for their credulity his titles too "toxic"."We have not been systematically and significantly" net short position "on derivatives of residential mortgages in 2007 and 2008," replied Lloyd Blankfein.
Meanwhile in the Senate floor, Democratic leaders and Republicans arguing over procedural votes before engaging in substantive debate on the reform of Wall Street. The Conservatives want by all means restrict the scope of Democrat Bill before it is submitted to a plenary debate in the room. A compromise is always likely, because both parties want to correct the excesses that precipitated the financial crisis.But the Republican minority wants to take his time, while Democrats want to take this case Goldman Sachs to prohibit such banks with access to the discount window the Fed to speculate on their own account.
ALSO READ:
Goldman Sachs: Fabrice Tourre rejects charges
Goldman Sachs explained to Congress
"An adviser employment center follows on average 90 to 95 files" recalled Laurent Wauquiez Friday. Enough to justify the listing of the use of additional reinforcements. Secretary of State for Employment was shown Friday in favor of hiring 1,000 people in one-year contract. He "hopes to be operational in February, to help the 47,000 employees that already work center.
"These forces will be assigned to keep the front of compensation to avoid a bug as in 1993" and "coming as reinforcements in the regions most vulnerable," said Laurent Wauquiez front of the Journalists Association of Social Information, stressing that "these reinforcements are designed to help us get through the crisis." Asked about the financing of its additional measures, the Secretary of State has estimated the budget sufficient employment center to fill them.
Merging ANPE-UNEDIC occurred against all odds in economic crisis has created a very tense social climate in the new public. To cope with the influx of job seekers – 80,700 salaried jobs have been destroyed in the third quarter of 2009 according to latest figures from INSEE – CDI hires in 1840 and 1000 or hiring in fixed-assisted contracts have already been made since early 2009.
"We certainly have participated in things that were not correct and we are sorry. We apologize. " This was said boss of Goldman Sachs (GS) Lloyd Blankfein, who tried to extinguish the controversy after his recent interview with London's Sunday Times newspaper in which he said that banks had "an important social "and that his, in particular, worked" in the service of God. " Remarks that he "would not have had to" speak, "he later confessed.
Apologies for the investment bank came at a time when it is subjected to a barrage of criticism. Goldman Sachs has been in effect during the first 9 months of the year the bank's most profitable and the NYSE has already provisioned 16.7 billion dollars to reward traders and executives. Approximately more than $ 500,000 in premium per employee.Astronomical sums deemed by the Americans, but that Blankfein stands by the fact of not wanting to lose his "talent due to a change in methods of remuneration."
So, trying to get closer to its humanitarian principles and the "social role" he defends, Blankfein said the bank would release $ 500 million to help 10,000 small U.S. companies. A collaborative initiative with billionaire Warren Buffett, who will co-direct the panel to oversee the entire operation.In practice, Goldman Sachs will provide annually $ 100 million, or about what he earns in a day of good trading! The Financial Times reports that during the third quarter, the investment bank has recorded 36 days during which its traders have gained daily more than 100 million dollars …
ALSO READ
"Warren Buffett is doubling down on Wal-Mart
Nothing worked. Neither the words of Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the Eurogroup, nor even those of Ben Bernanke, the Fed chief. The dollar is falling and the euro rises. This was decided by the market, more than ever sovereign foreign exchange. While the major fundraisers of the euro zone met yesterday in Luxembourg, the European currency traded against 1.49 dollars, up from Friday night. The comments of Jean-Claude Juncker at the weekend, suggesting that the ECB might intervene to support the dollar, have not impressed the markets busy to take risks amid low interest rates in the United States. The speech of Ben Bernanke on Monday called for reducing U.S. deficits, nor has helped strengthen the greenback.
ALSO READ
"The euro is close to the bar $ 1.50
The weak American dollar worries