Competitiveness: the opinions of four contractors
CLAUDE TAR: "I will lose market"
CEO of Ultralu, specializing in scaffolding, member of the movement Ethic.
"Since I started my business in 1988, I am facing problems due to the rigidity of employment. Like many entrepreneurs, I have suffered the brunt of the crisis. The shock was brutal since 2008 should be a year of strong expansion. I predicted a 30% increase in sales and I hired six people. In our business, it is necessary to train an employee for six months to make it operational.
The crisis caused a 20% drop in sales. The six people hired have become an unbearable burden for the company. I had to part with it. Unfortunately, no administrative delays allowed me to do that in 2009 when the company had posted a loss of 50,000 euros in 2008. A dismissal for economic reasons cost me 40,000 euros.
After having recovered in 2010, my company was again able to be increasing. So I could rehire taking a risk because nobody can be sure that a new crisis will not occur. I will not do. I decided to retain the current workforce by stabilizing my figure and therefore of losing markets.
I chose this solution because the bankers who supported me in 2008 and 2009 will not understand if I do not learn from previous years. I can not take the risk of disappearing. "
CHRISTOPHER Collignon: "Let the air companies'
COO call center IMA Technologies, a subsidiary of Inter Mutual Assistance. Member of the Young Business Leaders, it animates the ethics commission and good practices Medef 44.
"We manage with existing regulations. We strive to meet everyone's expectations respecting the law and to the extent that this does not hamper production. We allow people who want to work at 60% to do so. Half the members of the Executive Committee are women who have decided to work at 80%. We also set up the working time of three people who wanted to start their own business. Any record created a strange atmosphere. But it is not possible to work more to earn more. The law does not permit an employee to work ten hours more if desired. We must let air companies and employees so they can negotiate their working hours.
I regularly discuss this topic with other entrepreneurs. It is important that leaders speak truth with employee representatives. I have set up agreements tests. It is also important that people can choose the working time. Someone may need to work 35 hours at a time and 39 hours to another. Our needs are not the same at 20, 40 or 60. It requires both trust and be realistic and do not forget one reality: the first objective of the company is to generate profits. "
Stanislas de Bentzmann "Managers have to work longer"
Co-CEO of the IT services company Devoteam, vice president of the employers' association Growth Plus.
"Policy makers plan to increase taxation frameworks to solve the budget problem, while the subject lies in structuring the value creation for the country. French managers take eight weeks and a half of vacation per year on average, five weeks against the rest of Europe. It is possible for a factory employee working over 35 hours thanks to the tax exemption of overtime, but this flexibility can not be applied to frames. But they are the ones who drop out contracts that run factories.
This is not only problematic for the industry, it is also for services. Service companies who work in large groups on international markets, because of RTT among other things, higher production costs than their competitors German or Italian. We must change the rules and give companies the ability to adapt to customer needs. Feasible by allowing businesses to reach agreement directly with employees, who are winners on both sides. France can accelerate its dynamic economy and reduce its debts if managers are willing to work longer, at least for the next five years. "
JEAN-RENÉ BOIDRON: "Being able to depart from the law"
President of the DL Health software company, President of the Social Committee of Growth Plus.
"It is absurd to impose the same working time everywhere. The unraveling of 35 hours has its limits. To meet their particular situation, companies need to discuss with staff representatives on the duration of working time and if necessary within the law or an industrial agreement. It is a matter of survival for many companies in the services, on the verge of suffocation, and whose turnover is correlated with working time. In from 39 to 35 hours, these companies have lost up to 10% of their turnover and nearly as many results. The rise in working time is their only option. For others, the decline in working hours can help through a difficult – while giving assurances to employees who must find more than their implementation, once the recovery of the acquired business.
These solutions are only possible with a quality relationship between an employer and its representatives. Otherwise I would have filed for bankruptcy in my previous company in 2001. Attitudes have evolved. Since 2008, the conventional termination showed that one could consider an employer and an employee adult enough to solve a problem. Have confidence in the company of actors to find solutions when it comes to saving jobs. "